GRASP.
Grasp · Comprehension Index Scan Report

Who still understands numpy/numpy?

Computed from git metadata only; no source code contents were read.
touch-weighted · 3-year history window · last commit 56d ago · scores are comparable only against same-mode scans

Grasp Score
46
touch-weighted living knowledge across the repo
Active humans
36 / 593
contributors active in last 90 days vs. all-time
AI-attributed minimum
≥ 0.1%
hard evidence only. Just 13% of commits here carry any attribution signal, so the real share is higher
Inactive share
64.5%
work by authors with no commit in the window; silence, not proof of departure
Composition
52/25/22/1%
source / tests / docs / config share of scored work
Living, source only
47%
the headline recomputed over hand-written source alone
Score stability
moderate
90-day-cliff variant reads 29%–50% across 60/90/180-day activity windows; read the width before the middle value

Dark-code ranking

Modules ranked by comprehension risk: the unknown share, amplified by ongoing change and thin ownership. The green meter is living knowledge.

ModuleRiskLiving knowledgeAI-attr. InactiveBusHeat/180d
numpy/randomMED 58
42%
0%67%164
numpy/libMED 57
44%
0%69%195
numpy/linalgMED 56
42%
0%68%144
docMED 55
40%
0%69%2209
numpy/f2pyMED 55
45%
0%74%0104
numpy/_coreMED 51
50%
0%63%11030
numpy/maMED 51
49%
0%61%157
numpy/typingMED 50
50%
0%52%1211
(root)LOW 49
50%
0%52%146
numpy/polynomialLOW 48
46%
0%63%130
numpy/testsLOW 48
42%
0%74%015
numpyLOW 46
54%
0%50%195
benchmarksLOW 45
43%
0%70%110
numpy/matrixlibLOW 44
43%
0%70%02
numpy/_pyinstallerLOW 44
42%
0%63%01
meson_cpuLOW 44
42%
0%74%01
toolsLOW 43
43%
0%67%217
numpy/testingLOW 43
47%
0%63%226
numpy/distutilsLOW 43
36%
0%73%20
brandingLOW 43
35%
0%72%20

One commit touched 63% of every file changed in this window. Wide, shallow commits, a formatter run or a license-header pass, add weight for their author across the whole surface while changing little. Worth looking at what that commit was before crediting the score to its author.

Public-repo caveat: "departed" includes drive-by contributors, overstating attrition relative to a company repo with a real roster. Engagement is a proxy for comprehension. Treat it as a potential indicator rather than a diagnosis.